gregpopik.com

23Nov/080

The death of democracy

Ok. Democracy is not dead. Just apparently brain-dead.

Nonetheless, the people have spoken and America has a new president. President Elect Obama has been quoted as cavalierly stating he will be cleaning up the way that Washington operates.

But Greg, as a gun owner I have to ask:  "so what, who cares, and what does this information do for me?"

Good question dear reader:  We need to be clear that we CANNOT sway the views of radicalized leftists. But by exposing the severity and persistance of the very corruption Obama has vowed to eliminate inside his presidency, we CAN educate those do not worship as the altar of the Obama demagogy.  It is crucial that we  expose how deeply in the pockets of left-wing lobbyists like George Soros the Obama administration consciously chooses to place itself;  even from the very outset of its tenure.

But don't take my word for it. Here's what USA Today had to say about it:

Obama pledges to clean up Washington

By Mike Glover And Ron Fournier, Associated Press Writers
DES MOINES, Iowa — Democrat Barack Obama, who says he swims in "the same muddy water" of lobbyists and fundraising that corrupts Washington, is pledging to reform the system if elected president.

Presidential rival Hillary Rodham Clinton "doesn't recognize the problem," Obama told The Associated Press in an interview late Thursday.

"I have a bunch of friends who were state lobbyists. The fact of the matter is ... I played poker with them, so I don't think that lobbyists are evil," said the first-term Illinois senator. "I just think they've got an agenda and you got to be clear about that, and not pretend that they don't."

"Why else are they getting hired and making all this money unless they're actually getting something done?"

The renewed criticism of Clinton and Obama's blunt assessment of his own role in the "original sin" of politics is the latest twist in a Democratic primary fight over lobbyist donations. Fellow Democratic candidate John Edwards has challenged both Clinton and Obama to join him in refusing campaign donations from lobbyists.

In a joint appearance recently, Clinton refused to accept Edwards' challenge and issued a rare defense of lobbyists, saying many "represent real people." Obama joined Edwards in criticizing the New York senator, despite a record of accepting donations from state lobbyists -- including some who regularly played poker with Obama during his days as a state senator.

Obama said Thursday he was not being hypocritical.

"I haven't gone around blasting Hillary" for accepting lobbyist money, Obama said in a 20-minute interview after touring the popular Iowa state fair with his wife and two young children. "What I said is she doesn't recognize the problem."

"My argument is not that we're perfect. I suffer from the same original sin of all politicians, which is we've got to raise money," Obama said. "But my argument has been and will continue to be that the disproportionate influence of lobbyists and special interest is a problem in Washington (and) in state capitals."

Obama pointed to his record of helping push ethics reform legislation through the Illinois Senate and Congress, and pledged to do more as president.

"I've fought for these issues," he said.

"The argument is not that I'm pristine, because I'm swimming in the same muddy water," Obama said. "The argument is that I know it's muddy and I want to clean it up."

A formidable fundraiser in a year of record-shattering political giving, Obama does not accept donations from lobbyists who press their cases in Washington, and he does not accept money from political action committees. He called that a good first step, if not a perfect one, that sends a signal that he would clean up Washington if elected.

"I do think that makes a difference," Obama said.

Not to Dan Leistikow, a spokesman for Edwards.

"John Edwards is the only candidate who has never taken a dime from PACs or Washington lobbyists, and he's leading the fight to get the entire Democratic Party to follow this example," Leistikow said.

While Edwards does not accept money directly from lobbyists, he eagerly solicits donations from people with ties to special interests and lobbyists -- particularly the trial lawyer profession, which has a stake in actions taken by the White House and Congress.

On Friday, the Edwards campaign sent a letter touting his challenge to Obama on lobbying -- and used it to appeal for donations.

Mark Daley, a spokesman for Clinton, said: "Senator Clinton has proposed real government reforms, including ending cronyism and stopping the revolving door from government to lobbyist, and she has the strength and experience to enact them."

Clinton is billing herself to voters as the only candidate experienced enough to be president. Obama is selling himself as an agent of change in Washington.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Odd that Obama made so much ado about Clinton's blindness to the evils of lobbyists. For a man who bills himself as a renaissance against corruption, he can't pick his partners worth a shit.

Obama appears to have let the proverbial fox into the hen house and joined himself at the hip with Hillary Rodham Clinton. Oh. I get it. I guess the point was to take her under his wing and reform her wayward ways? He doesn't accept political donations PERSONALLY.  But he certainly seems to surround himself with the usual suspects who will.

Presumably, I am patently wrong and there is great PR value to be had from having Hillary at his side. I've certainly been wrong before. But you owe it to yourself to watch the following videos and make your own decisions about Hillary's credibility.

embedded by Embedded Video

YouTube Direkt

embedded by Embedded Video

YouTube Direkt

After watching the two videos above, I am starting to smell that old familiar stink of corruption.

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

No comments yet.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.